Imagen del autor

John Broughton

Autor de Wikipedia: The Missing Manual

17+ Obras 166 Miembros 4 Reseñas 1 Preferidas

Series

Obras de John Broughton

Obras relacionadas

The Penguin Book of New Zealand War Writing (2015) — Contribuidor — 4 copias

Etiquetado

Conocimiento común

Miembros

Debates

Wikimedia nahe Publikationen en Wikipedia-Bibliothek (abril 2012)

Reseñas

A man's struggle and experiences with the early Church and religion. Not a particularly easy read, several formatting issues make it difficult to follow at times.
 
Denunciada
calenmarwen | May 29, 2023 |
Ce livre est un guide pour être un bon "wikipédien" et faire parti de la communauté Wikipédia. Il explique les conseils à appliquer pour que le site fonctionne dans les meilleures conditions mais ne traite le problème de cette encyclopédie que de façon subjective. En effet, même si ces informations pratiques sont appliquées, les erreurs dans les articles continuent d'exister malgré tout.
 
Denunciada
agatheldy | otra reseña | May 15, 2013 |
If you ever wanted to learn how to contribute to Wikipedia, this is the book for you. Wikipedia and its associated Wikimedia Commons and other Wikis are all complex web sites with lots of details to learn. Even a former computer programmer like myself finds it tricky at times, but the culture of the editors is helpful and welcoming.

Of course, there are disagreements, some of them quite nasty, but it is easy to make contributions in areas that are not controversial. My only warning would be that some people find Wikipedia editing addictive.… (más)
½
 
Denunciada
davidt8 | otra reseña | Mar 31, 2009 |
To start, this really is a guide for people who want to *read* Wikipedia. If you want to write for Wikipedia, you're pretty much out of luck, as there's only a little information about that. Even for reading Wikipedia, this book is fairly content-free. It has an introduction on how to find articles which are not obviously named, which is fairly useful, but isn't that difficult to figure out one your own. What I'd expected, even in a volume this slim, was much more discussion of how material gets contributed to Wikipedia, more discussion of the accuracy of articles, and of potential sources of bias in Wikipedia articles. There was some discussion of looking up citations, but given the problems Wikipedia has, there should have been more on that topic.… (más)
½
 
Denunciada
argyriou | Jun 12, 2008 |

Listas

También Puede Gustarte

Autores relacionados

Estadísticas

Obras
17
También por
1
Miembros
166
Popularidad
#127,845
Valoración
½ 3.4
Reseñas
4
ISBNs
18
Favorito
1

Tablas y Gráficos