Christine L. Borgman
Autor de Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet
Sobre El Autor
Christine L. Borgman is Distinguished Professor and Presidential Chair in Information Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles. She is the author of From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure and Scholarship in the Digital Age (both winners of the "Best information Science mostrar más Book" award from ASIST), published by the MIT Press. mostrar menos
Créditos de la imagen: via author's website, christineborgman.info
Obras de Christine L. Borgman
Etiquetado
Conocimiento común
Miembros
Reseñas
Premios
También Puede Gustarte
Estadísticas
- Obras
- 9
- Miembros
- 444
- Popularidad
- #55,179
- Valoración
- 3.0
- Reseñas
- 8
- ISBNs
- 23
- Idiomas
- 1
- Favorito
- 1
removed from their initial context. Data sharing is thus a conundrum. Four rationales for sharing data are examined, drawing examples from the sciences, social sciences, and humanities: (1) to reproduce or to verify research, (2) to make results of publicly funded research available to the public, (3) to enable others to ask new questions of extant data, and (4) to advance the state of research and innovation. These rationales differ by the arguments for sharing, by beneficiaries, and by the motivations and incentives of the many stakeholders
involved. The challenges are to understand which data might be shared, by whom, with whom, under what conditions, why, and to what effects. Answers will inform data policy and practice |
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Why is data Sharing Urgent?
3. What Are Data?
-- Communities and Data
-- Categories of Data
-- Purposes for Collecting Data
-- FIG. 1. Purposes for Collecting Data
-- Approaches to Handling Data
-- FIG. 2. Approaches to handling data
4. Why Share Research Data?
-- FIG. 3. Rationales for Sharing Research Data
-- To Reproduce or to Verify Research "Reproducibility or replication of research is viewed as
“the gold standard” for science (Jasny, Chin, Chong, &
Vignieri, 2011), yet it is the most problematic rationale
for sharing research data. This rationale is fundamentally
research-driven but can also be viewed as serving the public
good. Reproducing a study confirms the science, and in
doing so confirms that public monies were well spent.
However, the argument can be applied only to certain kinds
of data and types of research, and rests upon several questionable
assumptions."
-- To Make Results of Publicly Funded Research Available to
the Public
-- To Enable Others to Ask New Questions of Extant Data
-- To Advance the State of Research and Innovation
5. Discussion and Conclusions
6. Acknowledgments
7. References
SA - https://www.librarything.com/work/31585755/book/256874616 | https://www.librarything.com/work/31502625/book/255725622 | https://www.librarything.com/work/31453634/book/254994272 | https://www.librarything.com/work/31432400/book/254685366 | https://www.librarything.com/work/31575314/book/256775357 |
RT - Reproducibility
BT - Sharing
NT - Preservation
UF -This document discusses the challenges and importance of sharing research data in various fields of study.
SN - PDF copy of a journal article. (This entry does not reference a hierarchical list)… (más)