James K. Beilby
Autor de Divine Foreknowledge: Four Views
Sobre El Autor
James Beilby (PhD, Morquette University) is professor of systematic and philosophical theology at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota. He is the author of Thinking About Christian Apologetics and Epistemology as Theology, the editor of Naturalism Defeated? and the coeditor of numerous volumes, mostrar más including The Nature of the Atonement, Divine Foreknowledge. The Historical Jesus, and Justification. His written work has appeared in publications such as Faith and Philosophy, Philosophia Christi, Religious Studies, and Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. mostrar menos
Créditos de la imagen: Used by permission of Baker Publishing Group, copyright © 2008. All rights to this material are reserved. Materials are not to be distributed to other web locations for retrieval, published(see © info.)
Obras de James K. Beilby
Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (2002) 58 copias
The Routledge Companion to Modern Christian Thought (Routledge Religion Companions) (2013) — Editor — 13 copias
Etiquetado
Conocimiento común
Miembros
Reseñas
Premios
También Puede Gustarte
Autores relacionados
Estadísticas
- Obras
- 14
- Miembros
- 1,596
- Popularidad
- #16,155
- Valoración
- 3.7
- Reseñas
- 6
- ISBNs
- 30
- Idiomas
- 1
- Favorito
- 1
This book is incredibly helpful in mapping out the history, some biological/medical matters, and theological approaches to transgender questions. The introduction to the book, which frames and summaries this inta-Christian debate is worth the price alone. The authors representing the four positions are respectful towards one another, and present their positions well. The critiques offered by the interlocutors at the end of each chapter are fair, and avoid strawman arguments. I came away with a deeper recognition for the complexity of the issues related to transgenderism, both theologically (my field) and medically (not my field). Whatever one's position, this is not a matter to be quickly decided; careful thought is required. While I will leave it to the readers to decide for themselves which position they find most convincing, I will say that Strachan's position was probably weakened by his strong complementarian position, which tended to make him appear a bit tone deaf to the larger matters. This will make some of his possibly strong points less likely to be heard in the contemporary discussion. Overall, highly recommended book.… (más)