Richard Barbrook

there is no reason for this to be so goddamn long. its full of bloated biographical passages of gameplay which reveal nothing more than the authors own confusion and lack of direction

the critique of chess is pitiful and offensive. the argument for the revolutionary meaning of debord's "game of war" is weak, thin, strained, and unconvincing

if u want casual playful practice in strategic thinking, just play chess or go or checkers, or study military history if u must. but dont delude urself into thinking its eminently revolutionary… (más)