> Babelio : https://www.babelio.com/livres/Prigogine-La-nouvelle-alliance/63799
> BAnQ (Le devoir, 12 déc. 1981) : https://collections.banq.qc.ca/ark:/52327/2769239
> BAnQ (Le devoir, 4 oct. 1993) : https://collections.banq.qc.ca/ark:/52327/2765822 [article]

> Gohau Gabriel. La nouvelle alliance, métamorphose de la science.
In: Raison présente, n°56, 4e trimestre 1980. La parapsychologie oui ou non ? pp. 107-114. … ; (en ligne),
URL : https://www.persee.fr/doc/raipr_0033-9075_1980_num_56_1_2113

> Pour comprendre la vision scientifique, d’hier à aujourd’hui : la mutation continue et s’ouvre à l’infini. (Albert SARALLIER)
—Nouvelles Clés, (12), Juillet/Août 1990, (p. 49)

A classic. Worth reading and re-reading (even though I gave it only 4 stars ... it's really closer to 4.5). ( )

This fascinating book covers the rise of understanding of our world from the protoscience of the ancient Greeks to the mid to late twentieth century. For a popular account, there is a surprising amount of detail given. Prigogine is a renowned chemist and Nobel laureate; Stengers is a philosopher chemist. Together they present fact, interpretation, opinion and speculation. There is a strong emphasis on the role of order and the direction of changes. As the book proceeds they become concerned with issues such as whether laws describes reversible or irreversible processes, how simple regularities can appear in non-equilibrium systems, how macroscopic outcomes can become undecidable, and whether entropy must always increase.

Indeed much of the work is devoted to discussing far-from-equilibrium behaviours of systems. With the hindsight of a modern perspective, it is hard to judge how this work would have been received when first published in French in 1979. Yet undoubtedly the book had its largest philosophical impact on the non-physical sciences. Indeed the authors should be praised for being so open about their speculations about time, life and social organization. ( )

A thorough, but sometimes dense introduction to non-equilibrium thermodynamics. The author raises some interesting issues, especially with respect to the concept of time. The main problems with the book are some of the connections between philosophy, sociology and natural science, which seem quite a stretch, and the final chapters, which are supposed to show that the "arrow of time" exists at the microscopic scale, but fail to be convincing. ( )